Managed Care Information Center
MCIC Home
E-Mail MCIC
Site Navigation:
E-mail a Friend
FREE E-Mail Newsletters
Subscribe to the leading management newsletters
Search
Search
Affiliates
Health Resources Online
* * *
Health Resources Publishing
* * *
Wellness Junction
* * *
Healthcare Intelligence Network
Contact MCIC
info@themcic.com

Managed Care Information Center
1913 Atlantic Ave., Suite 200
Manasquan, NJ  08736
(732) 292-1100
fax: (732) 292-1111

Home / News & IndustryManaged Care Insight and Analysis
Updated: January 25, 2011
Physician Cost Profiling Reviewed: Bad Information: Inexpensive Doctors May Not Save Money

Insurance plans encouraging patients to receive care from physicians who keep medical costs lower are based on unreliable information, according to a new RAND Corp. study. Notably, estimates of doctor performance may not achieve the intended savings.

The first major assessment of physician cost profiling found that about one-fourth of the 13,788 physicians studied would be misclassified under the system of cost ranking commonly used by insurance plans, according to the RAND findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Health purchasers have focused cost-saving efforts on physicians because they write the orders that can drive increased healthcare spending. Health plans are limiting the number of physicians who receive in-network contracts, offering patients lower co-payments to see preferred doctors and paying bonuses to doctors who keep spending down.

"Our findings raise questions about the utility of cost profiling tools for high-stakes activities such as tiered health plans and the likelihood that wide use of these strategies will reduce healthcare spending," said John L. Adams, the study’s lead author and a senior statistician at RAND. "Consumers, physicians and those who pay for health care are all at risk of being misled by the results from these tools."

RAND analyzed insurance claims information for 2004 and 2005 from four Massachusetts health plans that covered about 80 percent of the non-elderly with private insurance. It used commercially available software to examine the costs of treating episodes of common illnesses such as diabetes and heart attack, assigning each episode of care to a physician and creating a cost profile for each physician based on all similar episodes of care.

Studying 28 physician specialties in detail, researchers found that only about 40 percent of physicians had cost profile scores that were at least 70 percent reliable – a common threshold for reliability –and fewer than 10 percent of physicians had cost profiles that were at least 90 percent reliable.

Reliability of Physician Cost Studies

Among physicians in a hypothetical two-tiered insurance plan, nearly 40 percent of internists and nearly two-thirds of vascular surgeons labeled as lower cost were not lower cost, according to the RAND study. Physicians in surgical specialties, in particular, appear to have low reliability cost profile scores, while dermatologists’ cost profile scores were the most reliable.

Funding for the study was provided by the U.S. Department of Labor.

Using statistical tools, researchers evaluated the reliability of physician cost scores by considering factors such as the number and types of patients physicians treated. The results show that the reliability of cost-profiling scores was unacceptably low for physicians in most of the specialty groups.

Researchers also examined how reliability scores might change across several different scenarios, suchas requiring at least 30 episodes of treatment to create a profile and different methods for assigning episodes to physicians. While some scenarios modestly increased reliability, the results still fell short, according to the study.

"These ranking systems may be useful for some purposes, but they are not reliable enough at this point to make decisions about encouraging patients to see certain providers or excluding some doctors from insurance networks," Adams said.

He said the current systems may be useful for efforts such as warning physicians that their treatment methods appear to cost more than those used by their peers and urging them to reexamine their practice styles.

While cost profiling shows promise as a strategy to reduce health costs, it cannot be successful until more robust tools are developed to use claims data and other information to create reliable cost profiles for physicians.

Address: The RAND Corp., P.O. Box 2138, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138; (310) 393-0411, www.rand.org.


  This article was taken from:
The Executive Report on Managed Care

Free Trial Subscription

Become a Subscriber

    Back to This Week's List of Articles

"Managed Care Weekly Watch"
Subscribe Here

Email:

Name:

 
Top | Home


Resource of the Month | Database of MCOs | Publications | News & Industry | Surveys & Research | Free Products | Advertising Arena | Inside MCIC | Managed Care Archives | ManagedCareMarketplace.com | For Subscribers | Customer Service

©2011 The Managed Care Information Center